Immune Thrombocytopenia in Adults: Modern Approaches to Diagnosis and Treatment
Abstract
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder affecting approximately 1 in 20,000 people. Patients typically present with clinically benign mucocutaneous bleeding, but morbid internal bleeding can occur. Diagnosis remains clinical, possible only after ruling out other causes of thrombocytopenia through history and laboratory testing. Many adult patients do not require treatment. For those requiring intervention, initial treatment of adult ITP is with corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin, or intravenous anti-RhD immune globulin. These agents are rapid- acting but do not result in durable remissions in most patients. No corticosteroid has demonstrated superiority to others for ITP treatment. Subsequent treatment of adult ITP is typically with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs; romiplostim or eltrombopag), rituximab, or splenectomy. TPO-RAs are newer agents that offer an excellent response rate but may require prolonged treatment. The choice between subsequent treatments involves consideration of operative risk, risk of asplenia, drug side-effects, quality-of-life issues, and financial costs. Given the efficacy of medical therapies and the rate of spontaneous remission in the first year after diagnosis, splenectomy is frequently deferred in modern ITP treatment algorithms. Fostamatinib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administra- tion) and several older immunosuppressive agents (azathioprine, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, danazol, dapsone, mycophenolate mofetil, and the Vinca alkaloids) may be useful in patients with disease unresponsive to standard therapies or in specific clinical circumstances. This comprehensive review explores diagnostic considerations and surveys new and old treatment options for adults with ITP.
Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder of excessive reticuloendothelial platelet destruction with inadequate compensatory platelet production. ITP results from the dual action of platelet autoantibodies that opsonize platelets and induce megakaryocyte apoptosis as well as direct T cell–mediated megakaryocyte and platelet destruc- tion.1–3 Modern definitions of ITP requirea platelet count < 100 × 109/L for diagnosis in a patient with no other underlying causes for thrombocytopenia.4,5 Primary ITP occurs in the absence of a clinically identifiable source of immune dysregu-lation, while secondary ITP occurs in the setting of such a source (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus or chronic lymphocytic leukemia). Diagnosis of ITP remains clinical, as there is no “gold standard” diagnostic test. Initial ITP treatment has remained largely unchanged for several decades, with cortico- steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) typically used to manage newly diagnosed patients and chronic patients requiring urgent rescue therapy.4,5 However, subsequent treatment options have evolved considerably over the past decade. While most of the older treatments worked to reduce platelet Issue Theme Acquired Platelet Dysfunction—Laboratory and Clinical Implications; Guest Editors: Anne-Mette Hvas, MD, PhD, Julie Brogaard Larsen, MD, and Leonardo Pasalic MD, PhD destruction via nonspecific action on the immune system, newer agents target more specifically the pathophysiology of ITP by improving platelet production or decreasing platelet destruction. In this review, we will assess modern practices in ITP diagnosis and treatment synthesizing the best available evidence and expert opinion. Diagnosis of Immune ThrombocytopeniaClinical,Presentation The incidence of ITP is approximately 1 in 20,000 people and increases with age.6,7 It is slightly more common in females.7 The initial presentation of ITP is highly variable, from inci-dentally discovered asymptomatic mild thrombocytopeniato severe, life-threatening bleeding. Patients who present with profound thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 20 × 109/ L and usually < 10 × 109/L) often have evidence of benignmucocutaneous hemorrhage, such as petechiae, ecchymoses, and oral mucosal blood blisters. Though clinically benign, this frequently brings the patient to clinical attention. Significant musculoskeletal bleeding, as occurs in severe coagulation factor deficiencies, generally does not occur, but there is a low, albeit important, risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and intracranial bleeding in profoundly thrombocytopenic ITP patients. Bleeds may occur secondary to trauma, other pa- thology (such as a tumor), or spontaneously. Intracranial bleeding typically presents as intracerebral hemorrhage and is the most common cause of ITP-related death, with a 50 to80% mortality in patients > 60 years of age and up to 20% mortality in patients < 40 years of age.8,9 In a meta-analysis of 17 studies, the rate of fatal bleeding in ITP was estimated at0.0162 to 0.0389 cases per patient-year.9 Rapid-acting treat- ment modalities such as corticosteroids and IVIG are admin- istered to treat and prevent such serious bleeding complications in the acute setting.While numerous factors impact the degree of thrombocy- topeniathat is likely to causebleeding, most ITP patients do notpresent with mucocutaneous bleeding or clinically significant hemorrhage until the platelet count is < 30 × 109/L and many patients remain asymptomatic in the 20 to 29 × 109/L or even the 10 to 19 × 109/L range.7 The most common symptom in ITP aside from bleeding is fatigue, which occurs in 20 to 40% ofpatients.10 Although the etiology is not entirely clear, fatigue can markedly affect quality of life in ITP patients and may evenbe an indication for treatment, which may be very effective at alleviating fatigue.11Although there is no test capable of reliably diagnosing ITP, a laboratory evaluation is recommended atdiagnosis to screen for potential causes of secondary ITP, uncover infections resulting in thrombocytopenia that may resolve with proper treatment,and rule out other causes of thrombocytopenia.4,5 Alternativecauses of thrombocytopenia, and the recommended assess- ments to rule out these disorders, are listed in ►Table 1.All adults presenting with new suspected ITP shouldundergo a comprehensive history and physical examination with the following laboratory studies: complete blood count, peripheral blood film, human immunodeficiency virus se- rology, hepatitis C serology, and comprehensive metabolic panel (including transaminases, bilirubin, and alkaline phos- phatase).5 The peripheral blood film should be examined to rule out evidence of other causes of thrombocytopenia as can be seen such as fragmented erythrocytes (suggesting throm- botic microangiopathy or disseminated intravascular coagu- lation [DIC]) or atypical leukocytes (suggestive of myeloid or lymphoid malignancy). Giant platelets are frequently seen on peripheral blood film in ITP. Quantitative immunoglobulin levels can be obtained in patients for whom a primary immunodeficiency (e.g., common variable immunodeficien- cy) is suspected or prior to IVIG infusion but are not required in all patients.5 Bone marrow evaluation is not indicated unless patients have additional unexplained cytopenia, a significant family history of thrombocytopenia or myeloid malignancies, or poor response to typical initial treatmentoptions (corticosteroids, IVIG, anti-D immune globulin).4,5While ELISA-based glycoprotein-specific direct platelet au- toantibody testing has been repeatedly demonstrated to have a high specificity in the > 80 to 90% range,12 it is notrecommended for routine diagnosis owing to its poor sensi-tivity.4,5 The sensitivity of platelet autoantibody testing for ITP diagnosis may be improved with adherence to recent laboratory platelet autoantibody testing guidelines,13 but this remains under investigation.
Other methods of platelet autoantibody testing, such as tow cytometric detection of platelet-associated immunoglobulin G, are additionally notrecommended.4,5Routine direct antiglobulin testing or testing for antinu- clear antibodies, antiphospholipid antibodies, antithyroid antibodies, or thyroid function is not recommended,4,5although targeted testing may have utility in certain patients given other medical history and findings on history and physical examination. For example, direct antiglobulin test- ing is appropriate in patients with a concomitant anemia with an elevated reticulocyte count or in those for whom intravenous anti-RhD immune globulin is being considered for treatment. Routine testing for thrombopoietin (TPO) levels, reticulated platelets, bleeding time, serum comple- ment, or platelet survival is similarly not recommended fordiagnostic purposes.4,5 There may be a role of serum TPO inpredicting response to thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) therapy,14 which is discussed in more detail later.Classification of Immune Thrombocytopenia The chronicity of ITP has been defined according to the report of the international ITP working group (IWG).15 Patients with ITP for less than 3 months are considered to have newlydiagnosed ITP; an alternative explanation for their isolated thrombocytopenia (►Table 1) supplanting the ITP diagnosis will eventually be found in approximately 50% of these patients. Persistent ITP is defined as disease duration > 3months but ≤12 months, and chronic ITP is defined asdisease duration > 12 months. These classifications are relevant as chronicity impacts disease manifestations (e.g., intracranial hemorrhage is much less common in patientswith chronic ITP).8,9 Systemic autoimmunity (especially systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome) History and physical examination Targeted serologic testing (e.g., antinuclear antibody, anti–double- strand DNA antibody, antiphospholi- pid antibodies) in patients with concerning findings on history and physicalChronic liver disease
History and physical examination Liver panel (transaminases, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase) Liver imaging (e.g., ultrasound) in cases suspicious for occult liver diseaseSplenomegaly History and physical examination Abdominal ultrasound to assess spleen sizeMalignancy History and physical examination Age-appropriate cancer screening Targeted evaluation as indicated based on history and physical examinationPrimary bone marrow disorders(e.g., myelodysplastic syndrome, aplastic anemia, leukemia, Gaucher’s disease) Complete blood count Peripheral blood film Bone marrow evaluation can be con- sidered in patients with unexplained concomitant anemia, leukopenia, or leukocytosis or steroid- and IVIG- nonresponsive patientsHeritable thrombocytopenias, e.g., Bernard–Soulier syndrome, MYH9-related disease, type IIB von Willebrand disease, Upshaw–Shulman syndrome Family history Peripheral blood film Specific coagulation or genetic test- ing in potentially suspicious casesAcute viral infections (e.g., Epstein–Barr virus, cytomegalovirus) and immunologic stimuli (e.g., vaccinations, transfusions)History and physical examination Viral serologies/PCR if specific viral infection(s) suspectedChronic disseminated intravascular coagulation or low-grade thrombotic microangiopathy History and physical examination Complete blood cell count Coagulation studies (prothrombin time, partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, D-dimer)Peripheral blood film Targeted imaging or invasive evalua- tion as indicated based on initial evaluation The severity of ITP has additionally been defined in American Society of Hematology (ASH) clinical practice guidelines.4 Patients requiring any disease-directed treat- ment for clinical bleeding manifestations are designated severe ITP and those requiring additional medical treatment following splenectomy are designated refractory ITP. Patients with refractory ITP have higher rates of mortality.16 While official terminology defines refractory ITP as failure of splenectomy, in modern practice splenectomy is performed only on a small minority of patients. Therefore “refractory” is often used to describe patients who have failed multiple lines of therapy (one of which may be splenectomy), although this is not a definition present in published guidelines.Response to treatment has also been defined by the IWG.
A “response” (R) is defined as a platelet count between 30 and 100 × 109/L and at least double the baseline plateletcount and a “complete response” (CR) is defined as a plateletcount > 100 × 109/L following treatment.15 There is no widely accepted definition of “remission” in ITP. Most investigations examining ITP variably define “partial remission” and “com- plete remission” based on arbitrary platelet count thresholds.17Initial Treatment of Immune ThrombocytopeniaITP treatment can be broadly divided into initial/acute treatment and subsequent treatment, which may require long-term administration. Each treatment has one or more distinct effects on the pathophysiology of ITP (►Fig. 1).Initial/acute treatment is administered on initial presenta-tion or acute relapse in a patient with profound thrombocy- topenia and/or bleeding manifestations. Agents in this category (corticosteroids, IVIG, IV anti-D immune globulin) necessarily have a relatively rapid onset of action (typically 1–2 days) and are not generally considered appropriate long- term treatments. Most adults with ITP will not maintain a normal platelet count after initial treatments alone, and those that relapse with bleeding or very low platelet counts proceed to subsequent treatments. Subsequent treatments to achieve long-term disease control or remission include TPO-RAs, rituximab, splenectomy, fostamatinib, and others.In ITP, as well as other thrombocytopenic conditions, treat- ment-triggering platelet count thresholds are frequently sought out or formulated by clinicians. Indeed, thresholds for treatment are described in consensus guidelines; for example, the ASH 2011 ITP guidelines suggest treatment should be given to newly diagnosed patients with platelet counts < 30 × 109/L.4 But multiple studies suggest a poorcorrelation, if any at all, between platelet count and bleedingin ITP in patients with platelet counts > 10 × 109/L.18–20 This is consistent with other studies that have demonstrated normal thrombin generation21 and bleeding time22 in patients with platelet counts as low as 10 × 109/L.
Additionally, platelets from patients with ITP are often larger and more functionalthan normal platelets, such that the overall platelet mass is higher than expected for a given platelet count.22Given this data, we will always treat any bleeding ITPpatient (regardless of platelet count), patients with a platelet count < 10 × 109/L, and most patients with a platelet count10 to 19 × 109/L. Beyond this, treatment indications arepersonalized for individual patients. Most patients with chronic ITP tolerate platelet counts in the 20 to 50 × 109/L range without spontaneous bleeding events. Considerationof platelet counts during prior bleeding events, activity level, lifestyle/profession (and associated trauma risks), costs and potential side effects of treatment, and patient preferences must be considered in all patients. In those patients with known platelet dysfunction, an additional hemostatic defect, planned surgery, trauma, or need for antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulation, or chemotherapy, higher platelet counts are Fig. 1 Pathophysiology of ITP and impact of ITP treatments. IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; BTK, Bruton tyrosine kinase; TPO-RA, thrombopoietin receptor agonist; FcRn, neonatal Fc receptor. often needed.23 Finally, ITP-associated fatigue may respond to treatment and resolve with higher platelet counts. Giventhe debilitating nature of this fatigue in certain patients, treatment may be indicated.11The mainstay of initial/acute treatment is corticosteroids, typically either prednisone (administered over a 4- to 8-week course [including taper] with a starting dose of ~0.5–2 mg/kgdaily, to a maximum of 80 mg daily) or high-dose dexametha-sone (administered as a pulse of 40 mg daily for 4 days for up to three 4-day cycles).4,5 Most responsive patients experience platelet count improvements 2 to 4 days after initiation ofcorticosteroids, but response may take 5 to 7 days or longer in some patients. Patients experiencing a major bleeding event and those with contraindications or nonresponse to cortico- steroids should receive IVIG. Intravenous anti-D immune globulin is another agent that can be used in the acute setting in RhD-positive patients, causing mild hemolysis to reduce platelet destruction in the reticuloendothelial system, but it is not available in many countries now because it may precipitate DIC. Each of these agents has response rates in excess of 70 to 80% in the newly diagnosed patient.How corticosteroids improve the platelet count in ITP remains unclear. Studies haveshown thatcorticosteroids reduce platelet autoantibody production and inhibit Fc receptor-mediated clearance by phagocytic cells24 but also increase platelet pro- duction.25 Additionally, corticosteroids may improve vascular integrity in thrombocytopenic states. Thrombocytopenia results in endothelial thinning and fenestrations which maypredispose to bleeding; prednisone has been demonstrated to reverse these changes in a rabbit model.26,27Prednisone and dexamethasone are the corticosteroids of choice in ITP. Studies comparing dexamethasone to prednisone or prednisolone have not demonstrated clear superiority ofany corticosteroid.28–30 In a meta-analysis of trials comparingdexamethasone to prednisone, dexamethasone was found to work faster but did not result in a higher rate of sustained remission.31 Either agent remains appropriate to use in most patients; in certain patient groups at higher risk of cortico- steroid-associated psychiatric side effects (such as very elderly patients), high-dose dexamethasone should be avoided.Several studies in newly diagnosed ITP patients have explored the addition of rituximab or TPO-RAs to cortico- steroids. Several studies combining rituximab with dexa- methasone demonstrated higher remission rates at 6 to12 months, but these improved remission rates were not sustained.32–37 A study of eltrombopag plus dexamethasone in the upfront setting is potentially promising, but additional follow-up is needed.38IVIG reduces Fc receptor-mediated clearance of platelets by the reticuloendothelial system. Several mechanisms have been postulated for this effect, including competition with platelet autoantibodies for FcRn receptor binding, which results in increased platelet autoantibody clearance; binding to FcγRIII on phagocytes, thereby preventing binding of platelet autoantibody immune complexes; and upregulating the inhibitory FcγRIIB on phagocytes.39,40IVIG can be administered either high dose (1 g/kg daily for 1–2 days) in emergent settings or lower dose (e.g., 0.4 g/kg daily for up to 5 days).5 It should be used in patients with major bleeding (often in combination with corticosteroids) or in patients who require acute treatment and either cannot tolerate or do not respond to corticosteroids.IV anti-RhD immune globulin reduces Fc receptor-mediated clearance of autoantibody-coated platelets by creation of a “controlled” red cell hemolysis. Anti-RhD antibody-coated red cells compete with autoantibody-coated platelets for FcγR on phagocytes of the reticuloendothelial system, reduc- ing platelet destruction. Intravenous anti-D immune globu- lin is licensed for a 50 µg/kg dose but appears to be moreeffective when administered at a higher 75 µg/kg dose.41,42Essentially all patients will have a modest hemoglobin drop of approximately 1 g/dL on average. Anti-RhD is effective only in RhD-positive patients who have not been splenec- tomized. It is an option in the initial/acute setting but has limited availability. Blood group testing, direct antiglobulin testing, and reticulocyte count should be obtained prior to administering IV anti-D immune globulin.5 Since DIC is a potential major adverse effect of this drug, patients should be closely monitored.Management of Nonresponding Patients in the Initial/ Acute SettingPatience is important when managing patients in the acute setting. At least 7 to 10 days from the initiation of treatment should pass before declaring failure of corticosteroids andIVIG.4,5 In these situations, several options should be consid-ered. The first is reexamination of the diagnosis, which may include bone marrow examination, to ensure that an alter- native diagnosis has not been missed. Additionally, other treatment options can be pursued, generally those deferred to subsequent treatment of patients who relapse after initial therapy (discussed in more detail later). Rituximab can be considered, but it often takes several weeks to work. A TPO-RA can be tried; we favor romiplostim owing to its higher potency43–45 and recommend administration of high-dose treatment upfront (5–10 µg/kg for 1–2 doses). This requirescontinued patience as TPO-RAs do not work immediately and require a minimum of 5 to 7 days before an effect is seen. Vinca alkaloids (vide infra) might also be considered given their rapid onset of effect, but their use is usually limited by the risk of neuropathy. Emergency splenectomy is another option; this is best reserved for truly treatment-resistant patients and a high degree of confidence that the diagnosis of ITP is correct. Bone marrow examination is advised beforeperformance of emergency splenectomy.4,5Platelet transfusion achieves a transient improvement of > 20 × 109/L in a significant minority of bleeding ITP patients,46 an effect that may be augmented with concurrent administration of IVIG.47 Nonspecific hemostatic agents, such as the antifibrinolytic agents tranexamic acid and ε- aminocaproic acid, may also be considered in the acutely bleeding patient.Management of Pregnant Patients Requiring TreatmentITP complicates between 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 10,000 preg- nancies,48 although it requires treatment only in about a third of cases.49 Pregnancy complications, including mater-nal hemorrhage, fetal loss, and low birthweight, are more common in women with ITP.50,51 Neonatal thrombocytope- nia may occur due to transplacental passage of plateletautoantibodies. Treatment should be administered for the purpose of maintaining an adequate platelet count in the mother (≥20 × 109/L until close to term, with the goal thenadjusted based on delivery procedures and potential require-ment for neuraxial anesthesia).5 Either corticosteroids or IVIG is appropriate for treatment. In patients unresponsive to either of these agents alone, a combination of corticosteroids plus IVIG can be attempted.52 There are inadequate data to recommend other treatments, which in a woman with inadequate response to corticosteroids and/or IVIG must be considered in a case-by-case basis. One such agent generally regarded as safe in pregnancy is azathioprine.5 The management of pregnant patients is discussed in more detail in a review by Gernsheimer and colleagues.
While most adult ITP patients respond to corticosteroids and/or IVIG, the majority will relapse following this response and progress to persistent and often chronic ITP. Many of these patients do not require treatment at the time of relapse because they are able to maintain adequate platelet counts without bleeding manifestations. For those patients who do require subsequent treatment, numerous options are available.Most patients who relapse following initial treatment will again respond to corticosteroids or IVIG, but recurrent or long- term use of these agents is generally not recommended. Chronic corticosteroids administered at doses > 5 mg predni-sone daily (or equivalent) results in an unacceptableside-effectburden and should not be used in lieu of other treatments, although some ITP patients can do well for years on low doses of prednisone (2.5–5 mg/day). For patients who progress to chronic ITP, corticosteroids and IVIG remain useful as rescue therapies for bleeding or profound thrombocytopenia.Current and upcoming international consensus report (ICR) and ASH ITP guidelines generally offer wide latitude in the selection of subsequent treatment in the postrelapse setting. The treatments with the most robust evidence in the subse- quent treatment setting are the TPO-RAs romiplostim and eltrombopag, the Syk kinase inhibitor fostamatinib, the anti- CD20 agent rituximab, and splenectomy. The proposed ASH 2019 ITP clinical practice guidelines that were unveiled at the 2018 ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition54 and made available for public comment list TPO-RAs, rituximab, and splenectomy as favored second-line therapies. Implicit in their analysis was the recognition that therapies previously deemed for “chronic” patients could be considered after 3 months of disease, and that splenectomy should be deferred at least that long if possible. TPO-RAs are recommended over rituximab and rituximab over splenectomy. In comparing TPO-RAs with splenectomy, the meritsofeachapproach arestated, butone isnot recommended over the other; rather the updated guidelines advise a joint decision-making process between patient and provider.destruction as well as a major site of platelet autoantibody production. Platelet survival improves over threefold following splenectomy.25 The early response rate to splenectomy is approximately 85%, with rapid responses in most patients.
Unfortunately, 20 to 30% of patients who initially respond to splenectomy will eventually relapse (most in the first year after splenectomy), such that long- term remissions are observed in approximately 60 to 70% of all patients.55 Patients under consideration for splenectomy should be vaccinated for encapsulated organisms (Streptococcus pneu- moniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Neisseria meningitidis).Following splenectomy in ITP patients, there is an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and sepsis.56 Since ITP patients already have an increased risk of VTE at baseline relative to the general population, the cumulative VTE risk (including splanchnic vein thrombosis) increases approxi- mately threefold following splenectomy56 occurring in 4 to 5% of patients in one large study. The risk of splanchnic vein thrombosis is over fivefold higher in the 3-month period following splenectomy and the rate of portal or splenic vein thrombosis was 74% in one study that employed systematic detection with abdominal CT scans between 3 and 7 days following splenectomy.57 The incidence of infections leading to sepsis remains persistently elevated by approximately twofold in splenectomized ITP patients relative to their non- splenectomized counterparts.56 Additionally, splenectomy may have other unforeseen consequences. For example, evi- dence has emerged that the splenic red pulp is the site of a unique undifferentiated monocyte pool that appears to exit the spleen following ischemic cardiac injury and may be important in repairing injured cardiac tissue.58 Additionally, a recent study has shown a nearly threefold increased cancer risk in patients following nontraumatic splenectomy.59Therefore, while splenectomy offers the promise of long- term remission in approximately two-thirds of patients, patients need to be informed of these risks and splenectomy should be delayed if possible. We favor a delay of at least 1 year in most patients. This is based on the finding that about one- third of adults with ITP will enter remission with medical therapies in the first year after ITP diagnosis.60 In addition, approximately one-third of patients with chronic disease may attain a remission.61 With the introduction of novel ITP therapies in the past two decades, the rate of splenectomy has declined precipitously, from approximately 30% of ITP patients in the United States in the mid-1990s to less than 10% by 2009.56 Prior studies demonstrating durable remissions in 60 to 70% of patients included many patients undergoing sple- nectomy as an early treatment following failure of initial corticosteroid-based management.
Given that splenectomy is now frequently deferred until several newer medical treat- ments have been attempted, the population of ITP patients proceeding to splenectomy in modern times may have more treatment-resistant disease. It is unclear if the historic remis- sion rates still apply to these patients.Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists Thrombopoietin receptor agonists mimic the action of endoge- nous TPO on megakaryocytes and megakaryocyte precursors, inducing resistance to platelet autoantibody- and lymphocyte- induced apoptosis, thereby promoting the survival, growth, and maturation of megakaryocytes. Therefore, TPO-RAs augment platelet production to compensate for increased platelet turn- over. In addition to their efficacy in ITP, these agents can improve platelet counts in chemotherapy-induced thrombocy- topenia, myelodysplastic syndrome, periprocedural thrombo- cytopenia in chronic liver disease, and aplastic anemia (whereeltrombopag can induce trilineage responses).62–66 Three TPO-RAs have demonstrated efficacy in ITP: the peptide agent romiplostim and the small molecule agents eltrombopag and avatrombopag. ►Table 3 presents an overview of the differ- ences between each of the agents. One or more phase IIIrandomized, controlled trials have been performed evaluating each of these agents; the results of these trials are summarized in ►Table 4. Regardless of agent, TPO-RAs have a higher overall response rate (70–80%) than other agents used for subsequent treatment of ITP but typically require prolonged durations of use. In patients with refractory ITP (relapse post-splenectomy requiring treatment), the response rate is approximately 40 to60%.67–69 While extended durations of use are expected, asignificant minority of responding patients demonstrate dura- ble, long-standing remissions after prolonged TPO-RA treatment.60,70Predicting Response to Thrombopoietin Receptor AgonistsEvidence has emerged that elevated baseline endogenousTPO levels (which are normal in > 75% of ITP patients) may predict response to the TPO-RAs in ITP14,71,72 in as much thesame fashion as endogenous erythropoietin levels can pre- dict response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents.
In a study utilizing a well-validated ELISA-based TPO assay with a normal reference range of ≤100 pg/mL, patientswith significant TPO elevations (> 200 pg/mL) were unlikelyto respond well to either eltrombopag or romiplostim, whereas patients with a normal TPO level were very likely to respond to either agent.14 While a study investigating the predictive value of TPO levels for response to avatrombopag in ITP has not yet been published, TPO values do predict response to avatrombopag in patients with chronic liver disease.73 Given the cost and duration of time required to titrate these agents to clinical effect, if validated in additional studies, the use of TPO levels to predict treatment response may emerge as a valuable tool in treatment planning.In selecting between the TPO-RAs, numerous factors are considered. Eltrombopag and avatrombopag are orally ad- ministered in contrast to romiplostim which requires weekly subcutaneous injections. Eltrombopag absorption is dramat- ically reduced by fat or divalent cation consumption, func- tionally requiring a 4- to 6-hour fasted window around its administration unless strict dietary restrictions are fol-lowed.74,75 Avatrombopag, by contrast, absorbs better withfood.45,76 Romiplostim is considerably more potent than the oral TPO-RAs in healthy volunteers,43–45 and may be more potent in ITP patients as well77; clinical response to thisagent appears to be impacted less by mild baseline TPO level elevations than eltrombopag.14 Failure of one TPO-RA does not preclude use of another; switching from one TPO-RA toanother is successful in many patients.78Dosing of Thrombopoietin Receptor AgonistsPer the prescribing information, eltrombopag is initiated at a dose of 50 mg daily in adults (25 mg daily in those of East Asian descent) and dose (12.5–75 mg daily) is titrated to platelet count.79 This agent has a half-life of 35 hours in ITP patients, so alternative dosing regimens administering the medication less frequently than once daily are reasonable and have been described in adult ITP patients.80 Romiplostim is initiated at a dose of 1 µg/kg/week per the U.S. prescribing information, which advises uptitration by 1 µg/kg/week until an acceptable platelet count is achieved.
However, most patients requiredoses ≥3 mg/kg/week to respond; so, in clinical practice (andin one of the phase III studies of romiplostim82), 3 µg/kg/week may be used as the starting dose with low thrombocytosis risk.83 Avatrombopag was recently FDA-approved for ITP in the United States. Initial dosing is 20 mg once daily, based on datafrom a phase III clinical trial demonstrating excellent platelet response rates with this dose.84Adverse Effects of Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists TPO-RAs are generally well tolerated in ITP patients, with mild to moderate headache as the most common side effect.67,82,84 Interval transaminase monitoring is advised for patients on eltrombopag due to the risk of hepatotoxicity.79 While throm- botic events, bone marrow fibrosis, and leukemogenesis are a theoretical concern with these agents, studies have not found elevated risks of these concerning side effects in ITP patients. Eltrombopag and romiplostim do not result in platelet hyper-reactivity or spontaneous platelet aggregation85,86 and numer-ous large randomized, controlled studies of ITP patients have not demonstrated a significantly increased risk of venous orarterial thrombotic events in patients receiving TPO-RAs as compared with placebo.67,82,87,88 Bone marrow studies in patients receiving TPO-RAs for extended periods show a very low risk (~5%) of marrow reticulin fibrosis (which readilyreverses on agent discontinuation) and essentially no risk ofirreversible marrow collagen fibrosis.89,90 Additionally, there is no evidence of leukemic potential for use of TPO-RAs in any disorder, including myelodysplastic syndrome, where there is no clearly increased risk of leukemic progression with several years of follow-up.91 Therefore, bone marrow examination is not indicated before treatment or for monitoring during treatment.Rituximab is a chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that depletes the B-cells that produce platelet autoantibodies. It is not FDA approved for use in ITP but has been a commonly employed ITP treatment for nearly two decades. Studies of mostly heavily pretreated patients demonstrate an overall response rate of approximately 40 to 70% with 4 weekly dosesof 375 mg/m2 of rituximab,92–94 although sustained remissionswere much less common. A meta-analysis of five trials con- taining a total of 376 adults with ITP demonstrated a 57% overall remission rate with rituximab, but remission rate at 1 year was 38% and remission rate at 5 years was only 21%.37
Alternate dosing of rituximab (both higher and lower dosing schedules) has been attempted95–99; it is unclear if these approaches are superior to standard-dose rituximab with respect to either effectiveness or safety. Rituximab may result in acute infusion reactions, but the most consequential potential long-term adverse events (especially with recurrent treatment episodes over time) are chronic B cell depletion and hypogammaglobu- linemia with attendant infection risk, chronic neutropenia, andprogressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.100Fostamatinib is a prodrug of the Syk (spleen tyrosine kinase) inhibitor tamatinib (R406).101 As Syk is active in numerous intammatory cells including splenic macro-phages, fostamatinib inhibits Fc-receptor-mediated clear- ance of autoantibody-coated platelets in the spleen. In two double-blind randomized controlled trials of heavily pre- treated patients with severe or refractory ITP and a mediandisease duration of 8.5 years, the overall response rate (one or more platelet counts ≥50 × 109/L over the 12-week trial period) was 43% in the fostamatinib arm versus 14% in theplacebo arm and the stable response rate (at least 4 of 6biweekly platelet counts ≥50 × 109/L) was 18% in the fos- tamatinib arm and 2% in the placebo arm.102 Responseswere durable in over half of patients maintained on fosta- matinib.103 As is the case for several tyrosine kinase inhib- itors, hypertension and gastrointestinal side effects (nausea,diarrhea) were common. Fostamatinib is initiated at 100 mg twice daily and can be uptitrated to 150 mg twice daily after 4 weeks if the platelet count is inadequate. If there is no response after 4 weeks at the highest dose, the drug should be discontinued.Numerous other medical therapies with immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory effects have been examined in ITP. ►Table 5 summarizes these agents. Studies of these agents are typically small and often retrospective; the overall re-sponse rate for these drugs is approximately 20 to 50%, depending on the agent and the ITP population, with lower response rates in more heavily pretreated patients with longer disease duration. Prolonged treatment is necessary to main- tain responses for all these agents, except Vinca alkaloids.
Conclusion
Diagnosis of ITP has changed little in the past decade, as there remains no reliable biomarker or gold-standard diagnostic test. While the search for such a test continues, diagnosis will remain clinical and possible only with exclusion of other causes of thrombocytopenia. ITP treatment has advanced considerably in the past decade, with the introduction of TPO-RAs and fostamatinib. As numerous additional agents are currently under development for ITP treatment, contin- ued advances are likely moving forward.